Open letters from United Space Bank to the Disclosure Project, Gaia TV, and communities exploring consciousness, human potential, and frontier research.
An invitation to exchange sources, challenge assumptions, and explore research questions together. Read the individual letters below.
OPEN CORRESPONDENCE / UNITED SPACE BANK
An invitation to explore together.
United Space Bank invites dialogue across disclosure, consciousness studies, human potential, and independent research. These letters introduce our knowledge library and ask how ambitious ideas can become carefully documented investigations.
Our starting points include White Noise Totality, the proposed White Noise Computer and Replicator, and future resource economies. These are speculative research concepts. We welcome criticism, alternative explanations, and tests that could change our understanding.
Open letters from USB · Prepared November 14, 2026. Inclusion does not indicate delivery, a response, endorsement, or a partnership. The organizations below have distinct missions and do not all describe themselves as New Age.
01 / DISCLOSURE & FUTURE TECHNOLOGY
To Dr. Steven Greer and the Disclosure Project
Dear Dr. Greer and the Disclosure Project team,
United Space Bank invites a conversation about public access to knowledge and the responsible investigation of extraordinary technology claims. Your disclosure work raises questions about how testimony, records, and proposed mechanisms can be made available for meaningful examination.
Our library explores concepts for computing, resource production, and space development. We would welcome your recommendations for publicly accessible primary documents that could inform this work, particularly material with clear provenance and technical details that independent researchers can assess.
Could we begin with one bounded research question and an annotated reading list? We propose separating witness accounts, interpretations, and independently reproduced results so readers can understand both the possibilities and the remaining uncertainty. Our aim is a useful exchange of sources and criticism, with peaceful public benefit as the guiding purpose.
Your platform brings audiences into conversations about consciousness, spiritual exploration, and the unexplained. United Space Bank invites an editorial exchange about how those conversations can inspire thoughtful research and an imaginative vision of humanity’s future.
We would welcome discussion of a possible interview or documentary conversation about our knowledge library, White Noise Totality, and the relationship between speculative design and testable questions. A useful format would pair the author’s vision with independent questions and a reading list that viewers can examine themselves.
Could your editorial community suggest the questions that such a conversation should address? We would want any future feature to identify concept illustrations, distinguish personal experience from established findings, and give room to uncertainty and disagreement. This letter proposes a conversation; no program, distribution agreement, or collaboration has been arranged.
United Space Bank invites your perspective on turning questions about consciousness into clear research protocols. Your work connecting scientific inquiry with experiential exploration is relevant to the questions our readers bring to the library.
We are interested in how subjective reports, attention, and intention can be studied without assuming that an unusual experience establishes a proposed physical mechanism. Our experimental research studio would benefit from criticism of its assumptions and recommendations for accessible methodological reading.
Would you point us toward published protocols that illustrate preregistration, appropriate controls, transparent analysis, and independent replication? A focused starting point could be a public methods note explaining what a particular experiment can and cannot establish. We would welcome null results and methodological objections as contributions to the same inquiry.
United Space Bank invites dialogue about the careful documentation of experiences associated with meditation, sound, and altered states of awareness. Your educational and research activities offer a relevant starting point for questions about how people describe and interpret these experiences.
We would appreciate recommendations for research literature and ways to record subjective reports consistently. In particular, we are interested in separating a participant’s experience, its interpretation, and any independently measurable observation.
Could a first exchange focus on a reading guide for newcomers, including the limits of existing evidence and the questions still open? We would also welcome discussion of participant consent, privacy, and how expectations may influence reports. Our purpose is to help readers investigate responsibly while leaving room for personal meaning.
To the International Association for Near-Death Studies
Dear IANDS researchers, educators, and community,
United Space Bank invites your guidance on presenting near-death experience research with care for the people whose experiences are being discussed. Questions about consciousness and continuity of identity deserve both intellectual attention and respect for personal testimony.
We would welcome an introductory bibliography that distinguishes experience reports, observational studies, and competing explanations. Our readers would benefit from understanding how researchers handle memory, timing, cultural context, and the limits of what available records can establish.
Could you recommend public educational resources that we may link to and accurately summarize? We would also appreciate guidance on consent and attribution before sharing anyone’s account. A possible exchange would focus on research literacy and compassionate discussion, without presenting these experiences as proof of immortality or promising personal outcomes.
Dear IRVA researchers, practitioners, and community,
United Space Bank invites a methodological conversation about remote viewing studies. Our research studio explores how voluntary reports and sketches could be documented and evaluated in a controlled workflow, including the limitations of adding EEG or AI-generated illustrations.
We would welcome published protocols addressing target selection, information leakage, independent judging, and the preservation of complete session records. Generated imagery should remain identified as interpretation, rather than being treated as additional evidence of a target.
Could your research community suggest a small, preregistered protocol suitable for independent review? We would want responses frozen before target feedback, scoring criteria fixed in advance, and every outcome retained. The first step is critique of the design, with no assumption that remote viewing is a reliable source of hidden information.
Dear Society for Scientific Exploration members and editors,
United Space Bank invites critical engagement with the unconventional questions in our concept library. Your forum for research on unusual topics is a relevant place to ask how an ambitious proposal can become precise enough to assess.
We would welcome suggestions for a review framework covering operational definitions, measurement, alternative explanations, and reproducibility. For proposals such as the White Noise Computer or Replicator, the immediate task is to state assumptions and identify which claims could be tested at all.
Could a first exchange examine one short concept brief and identify its strongest objections? An annotated critique would help our readers understand where an idea is speculative, where it conflicts with existing knowledge, and what evidence would be needed to revise that assessment. We seek constructive scrutiny rather than a presumption of feasibility.
United Space Bank invites a conversation about the human side of future technology. Esalen’s focus on human potential offers a perspective on questions that technical diagrams alone cannot answer: what people need, how communities learn, and what a worthwhile future feels like to those living in it.
Our resource-economy and space-community concepts raise questions about participation, dignity, access, and responsibility. We would welcome reading suggestions and criticism that help us make those questions part of the design from the beginning.
Could an initial exchange explore a discussion guide about abundance, belonging, and meaningful work? We are interested in practices for inclusive dialogue and in perspectives that challenge our assumptions. Any future gathering would require a separate agreement; this letter is an invitation to begin thinking together.
To independent researchers and New Age communities
Dear researchers, study circles, consciousness communities, and independent thinkers,
United Space Bank welcomes dialogue with people exploring the relationship between mind, matter, technology, and humanity’s future. This invitation extends to meditation groups, transpersonal researchers, citizen-science projects, disclosure communities, and others whose questions cross conventional boundaries.
We invite you to introduce one question, share sources you have permission to distribute, and explain what observation might change your view. Personal experience, philosophical interpretation, and experimental evidence can each contribute when their differences remain clear.
A useful beginning could be a reading list, a critique of a concept, or a proposal for a small reproducible study. Tell us what your community investigates and where you see an opportunity for thoughtful exchange. Participation does not require agreement with USB’s ideas, and a conversation creates no membership obligation or partnership.
For a response, correction, or research introduction, write to support@unitedspacebank.com and name the letter in your subject. Please share only material you have permission to disclose. Any publication of correspondence would be agreed with its author first.
